Talk:Roundtable Survey - Nov 2007

The following has been copied from the initial discussion on the survey.

Key Objectives
Keep it really direct & simple.

Focus on:
 * 1) Did the OpenSpace Technology session work for people
 * 2) Was the outcome of the last Roundtable session worthwhile
 * 3) How to drive ongoing collaboration

Proposed Questions
Answer questions with one of: (1) Strongly Disagree (2) Disagree (3) Not Applicable (4) Agree (5) Strongly Agree


 * 1) The OpenSpace Technology session worked for me.
 * 2) I would like to use the OST approach at future BPM Round Table sessions.
 * 3) I would like to use the OST approach at ALL future BPM Round Table sessions.
 * 4) I am prepared to participate in a weekly conference call (max. 1h) aimed at productive collaboration between quarterly BPM Round Table meetings.
 * 5) I am prepared to contribute further time - by way of actions between conference calls - in order to make the collaboration work.

Answer questions indicating your willingness to use each of the following collaboration technologies with one of: (1) Cannot Use (2) Do not want to Use (3) Not Interested (4) Could Use (5) Want to Use


 * 1) BPM Roundtable Wiki on Wikia
 * 2) Forum on QUT BPM Roundtable site
 * 3) Group on Facebook
 * 4) E-mail
 * 5) RSS subscriptions to Roundtable content
 * 6) Other collaboration forum (please specify)

Also, a couple of open questions:
 * The one thing that I think works best about the BPM Round Table is ...
 * If I could change one thing about the BPM Round Table, it would be ...

And the initial feedback on the OST we captured from participants at the September 2007 Round Table was: With the following improvement suggestions: ‎
 * lots of conversations that were had that may not have been had in a more structured environment ‎
 * quality conversations with individuals ‎
 * distractions turned into valuable discussions ‎
 * coffee conversations weren't all had at coffee time
 * made good use of the white board and the sticky wall - just need more use of them
 * good at identifying lots of issues fresh eyes looking at issues - but not much resolution - what do we take home with us? ‎
 * note the objective of the session at the start and focus discussions around that ‎
 * outcomes not reflective of effort – need to write down ideas as we go (on flipcharts) so as to ensure capture ‎